The guy ordered and you will increased right here just what became his domestic into 2nd 22 ages and on this one all of the children were created except the two earliest. Within the 1891 the guy marketed that it family and bought area thirty-two from inside the cut-off ten regarding five kilometers northeast away from Chillicothe, which he improved and you will kept just like the a property-stead.
Bound to help you and you can subscribed just before me personally, which twenty-first day’s October
His Christian lives offered by way of a time period of more than 40 years. He stored solidly toward Ancient Baptist faith, and therefore became their whole comfort in the history weeks and also by one another precepts and analogy he represented the highest types of an enthusiastic Western resident.
Draw MEEKS’ next matrimony, to help you Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] are September 21, 1858 within the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. You’ll find nothing known throughout the a married relationship so you’re able to a beneficial COHEN aside from the marriage licenses, submitted within Matrimony Book step one, web page 914, info the wedding while the anywhere between age, and you will Sarah produced their unique draw. The marriage try performed by the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.
T. KERLEY
We, T. https://lovingwomen.org/sv/blog/gifta-sig-med-en-ukrainsk-kvinna/ T. KERLEY, create solemnly claim that we in the morning 21 years of age, and therefore Miss W. C. MEEKS try 18/seven yrs . old, and therefore there aren’t any courtroom arguments to your Relationship. J. C. WELLS becoming sworn states that the moms and dads regarding Skip W. C. MEEKS enjoys offered the complete accept the wedding of the daughter so you can Mr. T.
Sarah and you may Draw resided to the west of Haynesville when you look at the Claiborne Parish to possess a bit along with probably only 1 youngster, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the fresh partner of T. All the family relations information indicate that Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY came to be November 30, 1865, from the Promise, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, and the grave marker implies a date away from beginning off 1865. I would suggest, but not, the go out of beginning have actually already been November 30, 1863 in lieu of that time in 1865. Of course, there’s absolutely no beginning certification. The newest passing certification is no help, since it indicates a date regarding beginning out-of November 31, 1886, more than 5 years adopting the big date out-of their unique matrimony. It will indicate an era within loss of 52, and because brand new passing took place January sixteen, 1919, she’d was indeed born when you look at the 1866, making the 1886 most likely a typographical error. To get the many delivery day, I have three objections:
- This new census taker in 1870, functioning August 23, 1870, showed that brand new little one’s ages is actually nine. When you are census takers is notoriously crappy at the many years, it is very strange, I do believe, for this younger an infant having a delivery date one to miles away. It can only be 36 months incorrect to your fixed big date unlike 5 years incorrect to your 1965 time. This new 1880 census taker noted this given that 18, once again too-old for sometimes day and wrong since before her wedding, demonstrated below, whenever she wasn’t yet 18.
- One particular significant argument I’ve ‚s the matrimony licenses, copied verbatim with the figure ?. There are 2 changes to the printed means, the first as being the requisite the woman feel about to try to get years old in the place of parental agree, therefore the 2nd being your away-dated means is published for use with the very first about three digits of one’s date being „187”, which is entered on inform you a romantic date off Oct 21, 1881. Having a good November 29th birthday celebration and become seventeen, the entire year regarding birth have to be 1863. When the she was ten as opposed to about 1 month bashful out of you are, perform the latest clerk possess approved the definition of of one’s groom’s brother your bride’s mothers acknowledged the wedding?